4K, 8K: Can Your Eyes Really See the Difference ? 📺

Cliquez ici pour lire en français

For years, TV manufacturers have been pushing us toward more and more pixels. After Full HD, 4K became the standard, and now 8K is knocking at our doors with its 33 million pixels. But here’s where a scientific study throws a wrench in the works: what if our eyes simply can’t perceive all that definition? Researchers from the University of Cambridge and Meta Reality Labs conducted an in-depth investigation into the actual limits of human perception, and their conclusions seriously challenge this frantic race for pixels.

What Science Actually Says About Your Eyes 🔬

The Cambridge study reveals that in typical living room conditions, with a viewer sitting about 2.5 meters from a 44-inch TV, a 2K screen would be sufficient to render all the details the eye can distinguish. Beyond that, 4K or 8K would offer more pixels than our vision can actually exploit.

The researchers developed an innovative approach to precisely measure our visual capacity. They used a 4K screen mounted on a movable rail, allowing them to bring it closer or farther from participants who had to identify colored lines and patterns at different distances. This method allowed them to define what they call « retinal resolution » – the point where adding pixels becomes imperceptible.

The result is surprising: participants achieved an average of 94 pixels per degree (PPD) on grayscale images, far more than the 60 PPD of the so-called « 20/20 » vision standard. But watch out, this performance drops significantly with colors. Perception drops to 89 PPD for red and green, and only 53 PPD for yellow and violet.

As Professor Rafał Mantiuk, co-author of the study, explains: our eyes aren’t ultra-precise sensors, but our brain compensates by interpreting signals to construct a coherent image of reality.

Size Matters (Really) 📏

Here’s where it gets interesting: these numbers apply to a 44-inch screen, but as soon as you move to 55 or 65 inches, 4K becomes useful, and beyond 65 inches, 8K starts to make sense.

On a 100-inch TV, the jump from 4K to 8K brings a visible sharpness gain at about 2 to 3 meters. For a 32-inch monitor, the difference becomes perceptible at 70 cm, a typical configuration for graphic designers, photographers, or video editors.

Researchers even created a free online calculator to determine the optimal resolution based on your setup. The equation is simple: the larger your screen and the closer you are, the more a high resolution makes sense.

The Ghost Content Problem 👻

Even if your eyes could perfectly distinguish 8K, a major obstacle remains: content. Streaming platforms like Netflix, Disney+, and Amazon Prime Video currently cap their offerings at 4K resolution, and even 4K struggles to establish itself on traditional channels.

In native 8K, there are essentially just a few demo videos on YouTube and experimental content. For cinema, 8K makes sense because even a 4K signal isn’t perfectly clear from the front rows, but we’re talking about a diagonal of at least 10 meters.

Manufacturers are betting everything on AI-powered upscaling to transform 4K or Full HD content into « pseudo-8K. » Samsung developed the NQ8 AI Gen3 processor that embeds 768 neural networks to analyze and enhance each image. The results can be convincing, but it’s algorithmic enhancement, not true native definition.

What Really Matters When Choosing Your TV 🎯

If resolution isn’t the ultimate criterion, what should you focus on? Display technology makes all the difference.

OLED remains the reference for cinephiles. These TVs offer absolute blacks and unmatched intra-image contrast, with ultra-fast response time under 0.1 ms guaranteeing exceptional fluidity. Recent models equipped with OLED META or QD-OLED panels now reach brightness peaks up to 2000 nits, addressing their former weakness in bright environments.

QLED and Mini-LED, on the other hand, shine (literally) in lit rooms. Their very high brightness, often exceeding 1500 nits, and excellent anti-reflective filter ensure readable and contrasted image even in direct sunlight. It’s the ideal choice for very open living rooms or sunrooms.

QD-OLED combines the best of both worlds: it enriches the OLED experience with more saturated colors and increased brightness, ideal for demanding HDR content.

HDR: The Real Revolution 💡

HDR improves image quality by expanding the color palette and reinforcing contrast between dark and bright areas. HDR10 is the basic standard, but HDR10+ and Dolby Vision formats are more advanced and adapt the image according to scenes for more realistic rendering.

For gamers, all modern technologies now integrate essential features like ALLM, VRR, and low latency. OLED maintains an advantage with its ultra-fast response times, while Mini-LED offers beneficial brightness for colorful and dynamic games.

Science’s Verdict 🎬

This study sets the record straight: beyond a certain point, adding pixels becomes wasteful because your eye can’t actually detect it. For most standard living room setups, investing in an 8K TV brings no perceptible benefit.

Manufacturers like Sony have already slowed production of 8K models, lacking significant demand and a perceptible advantage for consumers. The market finally seems to be aligning with what science says.

Rather than chasing pixels, focus on what really makes a difference: display technology (OLED vs QLED vs Mini-LED), HDR, size appropriate for your viewing distance, and above all, the manufacturer’s image processing quality. An excellent 4K TV with a good OLED or Mini-LED panel and a powerful processor will far surpass a mediocre 8K TV.

The pixel race isn’t over – it’s simply moving to other territories like virtual reality, where the extreme proximity of the screen justifies dizzying pixel densities. But for your living room? 4K is largely sufficient for the vast majority of us.

What about you? What’s your experience? Have you ever tested an 8K TV side by side with a quality 4K? Share your opinion in the comments!