ChatGPT Images: OpenAI’s answer to Google’s Nano Banana is finally here🖌️

Cliquez ici pour lire en français

OpenAI is stepping on the gas when it comes to images in ChatGPT. After giving Google plenty of room to dominate the conversation with Nano Banana, the maker of GPT is rolling out a major upgrade to its image generation and editing capabilities. The new experience is built directly into ChatGPT’s interface, alongside a fresh API model dubbed GPT-Image-1.5.

The ambition is clear: make visual creation as fluid as conversation—and close the gap with, or even surpass, competitors on control, speed, and realism.

So, what exactly is ChatGPT Images? 🖼️

OpenAI is introducing a new image-focused “surface” inside ChatGPT. A dedicated Images tab now appears in the sidebar, where users can generate visuals from text, upload and edit their own photos, or mix both within the same conversation. Under the hood, everything runs on GPT-Image-1.5, which is also available through the API for developers and businesses.

The goal is to treat images as first-class citizens inside ChatGPT, not as a bolt-on feature like the early DALL·E integrations. This model is designed from the ground up to understand conversational context, follow instructions precisely, and produce outputs that actually fit into professional workflows—presentations, mockups, social media assets, e-commerce visuals, and more.

Faster, sharper, and genuinely useful 🚀

According to OpenAI, this new generation is up to four times faster than previous image models embedded in ChatGPT. Even complex prompts now render much more quickly. Where the old experience could feel like waiting for a “studio render,” ChatGPT Images aims for something closer to real-time brainstorming: tweak, regenerate, refine—without breaking your creative flow.

Accuracy is another major focus. The model handles text inside images more reliably (logos, headlines, posters, slides) and reduces familiar issues like warped letters or uncanny hands and faces. For content creators, solo designers, small businesses, and media teams, that translates to less time fixing bizarre details—and more time shaping the idea itself.

Source : © OpenAI

Image editing, Nano Banana–style ✏️🍌

This is where the comparison with Google gets interesting. Like Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image), ChatGPT now lets you edit existing images using plain language: remove an object, change a color, adjust the overall style, or swap out an entire element of a scene.

Upload a product photo and ask, for example: “Replace the background with a beige studio setup, add a subtle floor reflection, and soften the light on the left.” No Photoshop. No layers. Just text.

Source : © OpenAI

Localized editing and inpainting have also been significantly improved. ChatGPT can modify a specific area—foreground or background—without breaking the rest of the image, while maintaining a consistent style. The result feels less like rolling the dice on random generations and more like an actual creative dialogue. That’s exactly what made Nano Banana so compelling, and OpenAI is now matching that level of control—while leveraging the massive, already-established ChatGPT ecosystem.

Nano Banana vs. ChatGPT Images: who’s in the lead? ⚔️

Purely on visual quality, early public comparisons often give Nano Banana a slight edge in ultra-realism, particularly with faces, hands, and high-end photo-style renders. But ChatGPT Images pushes back hard in other areas: overall speed, seamless integration into a general-purpose chatbot, and ease of use for anyone already living inside ChatGPT.

Google is betting on a powerful visual editor deeply embedded in Gemini. OpenAI, meanwhile, is going all-in on an all-in-one experience: text, code, research, images—and soon video—within a single interface. For creators, brands, and developers, the decision may come down to ecosystem preference: do you want a best-in-class image specialist, or a versatile assistant that can also deliver strong visuals exactly when you need them?

Limitations, safety, and gray areas 🛑

More realistic image generation and advanced editing inevitably come with higher risks: more convincing deepfakes, misuse of real people’s images, and content that’s harder to distinguish from reality. OpenAI highlights its safeguards, including sensitive prompt filtering, restrictions around public figures, and safety mechanisms designed to limit abuse.

Still, as with Google’s Nano Banana, the line between legitimate creativity and manipulation is getting thinner. The difference between an AI that “fixes” a photo for publication and one that rewrites reality to serve a narrative often comes down to user intent, not technology. Regulation, transparency, and public education may end up mattering just as much as model architecture.

What this changes for creators (and everyone else) 💼

For content creators, small marketing teams, media outlets, and freelancers, ChatGPT Images turns visual AI into an everyday companion rather than an occasional tool. You can brainstorm a concept, write the copy, generate a thumbnail, tweak a photo’s colors, and draft the caption—all within a single conversation, with a single assistant.

For the general public, the update lowers the barrier to entry. There’s no need to master prompt engineering or juggle multiple services. You open ChatGPT, click Images, explain what you want like you would to a friend, and refine until it’s ready to post. In the long run, the real competition won’t just be about who generates the “best” image—but who simplifies the entire creative workflow from start to finish.

OpenAI, Google, and the future of visual creation 👀

With this new image experience in ChatGPT, OpenAI is sending a clear signal: tomorrow’s AI won’t just be a text engine—it will be a full-fledged creative studio, accessible through a simple chat window. As Google continues to push Nano Banana and Gemini across its ecosystem, the battle may shift away from benchmarks and toward real-world usage: which tool actually becomes part of the daily flow for creators, students, marketers, developers, and everyday users?

One deeper question remains. As these tools make visual creation nearly instantaneous, does the value move away from execution and toward raw ideas, storytelling, and trust in the source? AI already knows how to generate stunning images. The next challenge is figuring out how we, as humans, choose to use them, frame them—and believe them.

What about you? Do you see ChatGPT Images becoming your main creative studio, or will you stick with Nano Banana and other AI tools? Does this visual AI arms race excite you—or worry you about what comes next? Let us know in the comments. 👇