Is RCS the Future of Messaging – or Just Too Late ? 💬

Cliquez ici pour lire en français

You’ve probably heard of RCS—short for Rich Communication Services—showing up in Google press events or Android feature roundups. Pitched as the next-generation replacement for SMS and MMS, RCS has finally made its way to iPhones with iOS 18.

But beyond the headlines and hype, does this protocol really solve a problem that hasn’t already been tackled by apps like WhatsApp, Telegram, or Signal?

RCS is SMS—but smarter 🔧

RCS was developed by the GSMA to drag the aging SMS into the 21st century. Instead of being limited to short blocks of text, RCS supports group chats, high-res file sharing, video calls, location sharing, message reactions, and more. And because it runs over the internet (Wi-Fi, 4G, 5G), it offers a messaging experience that looks and feels much closer to modern apps.

Its biggest selling point? Universal compatibility. In theory, it doesn’t matter what phone you use or which carrier you’re on—RCS is supposed to just work, like SMS always has. That’s something Apple’s iMessage doesn’t offer outside its walled garden.

But RCS has struggled to live up to this promise. For years, Apple refused to support it, only caving under regulatory pressure and Google’s persistence with iOS 18. That delay slowed its global rollout—and gave rival platforms time to entrench themselves even further.

Arriving late to a crowded party 📲

While RCS is only now starting to feel “ready,” it’s joining a landscape already packed with apps that do the same thing—only better. WhatsApp, Telegram, Signal, Messenger, WeChat… they’ve offered rich messaging for years, and have the massive user bases and advanced features to back it up.

Even end-to-end encryption, one of RCS’s standout privacy features, is now table stakes across most major apps. So for a lot of users, RCS just feels like reinventing the wheel—and not necessarily a better one.

That said, RCS could still play a role where third-party apps aren’t welcome or practical. In enterprise environments, government use, or countries where messaging apps are censored or unreliable, RCS might offer a more secure, carrier-integrated alternative to SMS.

Adoption is still patchy 🧩

Despite its potential, RCS remains inconsistent. If one link in the chain—your phone, your carrier, or your app—doesn’t support it, your message defaults back to old-school SMS.

On Android, Google Messages and Samsung Messages already support RCS. On iPhone, compatibility is still tied to a future software update.

And if you’re running into bugs or delays, you can disable RCS manually in your messaging settings—a clear sign that it’s still a work in progress.

Big promise, unclear future 🔮

RCS is a long-overdue evolution of SMS. But arriving this late, in a world dominated by polished and battle-tested chat apps, makes its impact questionable.

For some, it may eventually become a baseline fallback—more reliable and secure than SMS, but not something they’ll actively choose. For others, it may feel like a solution to a problem that no longer exists.

Its future depends on whether phone makers, carriers, and developers can finally deliver on the “it just works” promise. Until then, most users will stick to what they already know—and trust: WhatsApp, iMessage, Telegram, or whatever app their friends are using.

👉🏾 Have you used RCS without even realizing it? What’s your take—overdue upgrade or irrelevant tech? Let us know in the comments! 😊